ETINIŲ APORIJŲ PRASM Ė IR/AR BEPRASMYBĖ: DERIDA POKALBIS SU LEVINU. (Lithuanian)

The article focuses on the deconstructive approach developed by Jacques Derrida towards Emmanuel Levinas's metaphysic-existential ethics. Regarding Derrida's critique of the religious character of Levinas's ethics, the goal of this analysis was to track Derrida's thought, with the intention of inquiring practicality or even intelligibility of the aporia, which, according to Derrida, are essential to Levinas's ethics. Following the analysis, the conclusion was drawn: Derrida's critique of Levinas is "valid" when constrained to aporetic deconstructionist logic solely. However, a clear existential moment - absolute opposition to general logic, hence to deconstructionist logic as well - can be found in Levinas's thinking. How the notion of the (im)possible is approached becomes the main disagreement between the two philosophers: for Derrida, the ethical relationship is haunted by the impossible, while for Levinas the possible is always the first as it comes before logos and / or metaphysics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Šiame straipsnyje nagrinėjama Jacques'o Derrida dekonstrukcinė prieiga, taikyta Emmanuelio Levino metafizinei-egzistencinei etikos filosofijai. Atsižvelgiant į Derrida kritikuojamą religinį Levino etikos pobūdį, šio tyrimo tikslas - sekti Derrida minties keliu, mėginant kvestionuoti praktiškumą ar netgi inteligibilumą aporijos, kuri, anot Derrida, yra esminė Levino etikai. Tyrimo pabaigoje buvo prieita prie tokios išvados: Derrida kritika Levino atžvilgiu esanti „validi“, jeigu norima išlikti vien dekonstrukcinės ar aporijų logikos lauke. Kita vertus, Levino mąstymas yra aiškiai persmelktas metafizinio-egzistencinio įsitikinimo - absoliučios priešingybės įprastai, vadinasi, ir dekonstrukcinei aporijų logikai. (Ne)galimybės koncepto ar fenomeno aiškinimas išryškėja kaip esminis skirtumas tarp abiejų filosofų: Derrida akcentuoja etinį santykį lydintį negalimybės pėdsaką, o Levinui galimybė nepaklūsta logos ar metafizikai, todėl visada esanti pirmesnė už negalimybę. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Logos: A Journal, of Religion, Philosophy Comparative Cultural Studies & Art (08687692) is the property of Logos and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)