| Sonstiges: |
- Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE
- Sprachen: English
- Publication Type: Journal Article; Review; Systematic Review
- Language: English
- [Contact Dermatitis] 2023 Feb; Vol. 88 (2), pp. 93-108. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2022 Oct 28.
- MeSH Terms: Dermatitis, Allergic Contact* / diagnosis ; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact* / epidemiology ; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact* / etiology ; Dermatitis, Occupational* / diagnosis ; Dermatitis, Occupational* / epidemiology ; Dermatitis, Occupational* / etiology ; Hair Preparations* / adverse effects ; Hair Preparations* / chemistry ; Occupational Exposure* / adverse effects ; Occupational Exposure* / analysis ; Hand Dermatoses* / chemically induced ; Hand Dermatoses* / diagnosis ; Hand Dermatoses* / epidemiology ; Beauty Culture* / statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions / complications ; Hair Dyes / adverse effects ; Hair Dyes / chemistry ; Hypersensitivity, Immediate / chemically induced ; Hypersensitivity, Immediate / diagnosis ; Hypersensitivity, Immediate / epidemiology ; Patch Tests
- References: Schwanitz HJ, Uter W. Interdigital dermatitis: Sentinel skin damage in hairdressers. Br J Dermatol. 2000;142(5):1011-1012. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03487.x. ; Symanzik C, Johansen JD, Weinert P, et al. Differences between hairdressers and consumers in skin exposure to hair cosmetic products: a review. Contact Derm. 2022;86:333-343. doi:10.1111/cod.14055. ; IARC. Some Aromatic Amines, Organic Dyes, and Related Exposures, Vol. 99, Lyon: IARC Publications; 2010. ; Uter W, Johansen JD, Havmose MS, et al. Protocol for a systematic review on systemic and skin toxicity of important hazardous hair and nail cosmetic ingredients in hairdressers. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(12):e050612. ; Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1. ; Miller JJ. The inverse of the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Am Stat. 1978;32(4):138. ; Barendregt JJ, Doi SA, Lee YY, Norman RE, Vos T. Meta-analysis of prevalence. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67(11):974-978. doi:10.1136/jech-2013-203104. ; Schwarzer G, Chemaitelly H, Abu-Raddad LJ, Rücker G. Seriously misleading results using inverse of freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation in meta-analysis of single proportions. Res Synth Methods. 2019;10(3):476-483. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1348. ; Symanzik C, Weinert P, Babić Ž, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and ethyl cyanoacrylate contained in cosmetic glues among hairdressers and beauticians who perform nail treatments and eyelash extension as well as hair extension applications: a systematic review. Contact Derm. 2022;86:480-492. doi:10.1111/cod.14056. ; Penchalaiah K, Handa S, Lakshmi SB, Sharma VK, Kumar B. Sensitizers commonly causing allergic contact dermatitis from cosmetics. Contact Derm. 2000;43(5):311-313. ; Singhal V, Reddy BS. Common contact sensitizers in Delhi. J Dermatol. 2000;27(7):440-445. doi:10.1111/j.1346-8138.2000.tb02202.x. ; Chan YC, Ng SK, Goh CL. Positive patch-test reactions to Para-phenylenediamine, their clinical relevance and the concept of clinical tolerance. Contact Derm. 2001;45(4):217-220. ; Ciconte A, Mar A, Horton JJ. Evaluation of the skin and cancer foundation standard series in the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Derm. 2001;45(6):329-332. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.450602.x. ; Akasya-Hillenbrand E, Ozkaya-Bayazit E. Patch test results in 542 patients with suspected contact dermatitis in Turkey. Contact Derm. 2002;46(1):17-23. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.460104.x. ; Hussain I, Rani Z, Rashid T, Haroon TS. Suitability of the European standard series of patch test allergens in Pakistani patients. Contact Derm. 2002;46(1):50-51. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.460111.x. ; Kohl L, Blondeel A, Song M. Allergic contact dermatitis from cosmetics. Retrospective analysis of 819 patch-tested patients. Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland). 2002;204(4):334-337. doi:10.1159/000063379. ; Li L, Wang J. Contact hypersensitivity in hand dermatitis. Contact Derm. 2002;47(4):206-209. ; Duarte I, Lazzarini R, Kobata CM. Contact dermatitis in adolescents. Am J Contact Derm Off J Am Contact Derm Soc. 2003;14(4):200-202. ; Li LF, Sujan SA, Wang J. Detection of occupational allergic contact dermatitis by patch testing. Contact Derm. 2003;49(4):189-193. ; Saripalli YV, Achen F, Belsito DV. The detection of clinically relevant contact allergens using a standard screening tray of twenty-three allergens. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49(1):65-69. doi:10.1067/mjd.2003.489. ; Lewis V, Statham B, Chowdhury M. Allergic contact dermatitis in 191 consecutively patch tested children. Contact Derm. 2004;51(3):155-156. ; Li LF, Guo J, Wang J. Environmental contact factors in eczema and the results of patch testing Chinese patients with a modified European standard series of allergens. Contact Derm. 2004;51(1):22-25. ; Pratt MD, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American contact dermatitis group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period. Dermatitis. 2004;15(4):176-183. ; Sharma VK, Sethuraman G, Garg T, Verma KK, Ramam M. Patch testing with the Indian standard series in New Delhi. Contact Derm. 2004;51(5-6):319-321. doi:10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.0459k.x. ; Akyol A, Boyvat A, Peksari Y, Gürgey E. Contact sensitivity to standard series allergens in 1038 patients with contact dermatitis in Turkey. Contact Derm. 2005;52(6):333-337. doi:10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00608.x. ; Kashani MN, Gorouhi F, Behnia F, Nazemi MJ, Dowlati Y, Firooz A. Allergic contact dermatitis in Iran. Contact Derm. 2005;52(3):154-158. doi:10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00545.x. ; Machovcova A, Dastychova E, Kostalova D, et al. Common contact sensitizers in The Czech Republic. Patch test results in 12,058 patients with suspected contact dermatitis*. Contact Derm. 2005;53(3):162-166. doi:10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00676.x. ; Wongpiyabovorn J, Puvabanditsin P. Result of standard patch test in patients suspected of having allergic contact dermatitis. J Med Assoc Thailand Chotmaihet Thangphaet. 2005;88(Suppl 4):S177-S183. ; Clayton TH, Wilkinson SM, Rawcliffe C, Pollock B, Clark SM. Allergic contact dermatitis in children: should pattern of dermatitis determine referral? A retrospective study of 500 children tested between 1995 and 2004 in one U.K. Centre. Br J Dermatol. 2006;154(1):114-117. ; Lazarov A. European standard series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7-year period from 1998 to 2004. Contact Derm. 2006;55(2):73-76. doi:10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.00875.x. ; Magen E, Mishal J, Schlesinger M. Sensitizations to allergens of TRUE test in 864 consecutive eczema patients in Israel. Contact Derm. 2006;55(6):370-371. ; Freireich-Astman M, David M, Trattner A. Standard patch test results in patients with contact dermatitis in Israel: age and sex differences. Contact Derm. 2007;56(2):103-107. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01004.x. ; Li LF, Liu G, Wang J. Patch test in Chinese patients with cosmetic allergic contact dermatitis to common cosmetic allergens from a European cosmetic series. Contact Derm. 2007;57(1):50-U2. ; Patel S, Basketter DA, Jefferies D, et al. Patch test frequency to p-phenylenediamine: follow up over the last 6 years. Contact Derm. 2007;56(1):35-37. ; Belhadjali H, Mohamed M, Youssef M, Mandhouj S, Chakroun M, Zili J. Contact sensitization in atopic dermatitis: results of a prospective study of 89 cases in Tunisia. Contact Derm. 2008;58(3):188-189. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01248.x. ; Collazo MH, Figueroa LD, Sánchez JL. Prevalence of contact allergens in a Hispanic population. P R Health Sci J. 2008;27(4):333-336. ; Davis MDP, Scalf LA, Yiannias JA, et al. Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standard series: a mayo clinic 5-year retrospective review, January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2005. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(1):67-72. doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2007.2. ; Duarte I, Fusaro M, Lazzarini R. Etiology of Para-phenylenediamine sensitization: hair dye and other products. Dermatitis. 2008;19(6):342. ; Ertam I, Turkmen M, Alper S. Patch-test results of an academic department in Izmir, Turkey. Dermatitis. 2008;19(4):213-215. ; Hogeling M, Pratt M. Allergic contact dermatitis in children: the Ottawa hospital patch-testing clinic experience, 1996 to 2006. Dermatitis. 2008;19(2):86-89. ; Lam WS, Chan LY, Ho SCK, Chong LY, So WH, Wong TW. A retrospective study of 2585 patients patch tested with the European standard series in Hong Kong (1995-99). Int J Dermatol. 2008;47(2):128-133. ; Onder M, Adisen E. Patch test results in a Turkish paediatric population. Contact Derm. 2008;58(1):63-65. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01171.x. ; Schnuch A, Lessmann H, Frosch PJ, Uter W. Para-Phenylenediamine: the profile of an important allergen. Results of the IVDK. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159(2):379-386. ; Thyssen JP, Carlsen BC, Sosted H, Menné T, Johansen JD. Frequency of p-phenylenediamine sensitization among Danish eczema patients tested between 1985 and 2007. Contact Derm. 2008;59(3):184-185. ; Warshaw EM, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American contact dermatitis group patch-test results, 2003-2004 study period. Dermatitis. 2008;19(3):129-136. ; Thyssen JP, Andersen KE, Bruze M, et al. P-Phenylenediamine sensitization is more prevalent in central and southern European patch test centres than in Scandinavian: results from a multicentre study. Contact Derm. 2009;60(6):314-319. ; Bilcha KD, Ayele A, Shibeshi D, Lovell C. Patch testing and contact allergens in Ethiopia-results of 514 contact dermatitis patients using the European baseline series. Contact Derm. 2010;63(3):140-145. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01740.x. ; Disphanurat W. Contact allergy in eczema patients in Thammasat University Hospital. J Med Assoc Thailand Chotmaihet Thangphaet. 2010;93:S7-S14. ; Helsing P, Gjersvik P, Holm JØ, et al. Variability in patch test reactionsfirst report from the Norwegian patch test registry. Contact Derm. 2010;62(5):309-313. ; Janach M, Kühne A, Seifert B, French LE, Ballmer-Weber B, Hofbauer GFL. Changing delayed-type sensitizations to the baseline series allergens over a decade at the Zurich University Hospital. Contact Derm. 2010;63(1):42-48. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01727.x. ; Wetter DA, Yiannias JA, Prakash AV, Davis MDP, Farmer SA, el-Azhary RA. Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;63(5):789-798. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2009.11.033. ; Yoo JY, Al Naami M, Markowitz O, Hadi SM. Allergic contact dermatitis: patch testing results at Mount Sinai Medical Center. Skinmed. 2010 Sep-Oct;8(5):257-260. ; Beliauskiene A, Valiukeviciene S, Uter W, Schnuch A. The European baseline series in Lithuania: results of patch testing in consecutive adult patients. J Eur Acad Derm Venereol: JEADV. 2011;25(1):59-63. ; Belloni Fortina A, Romano I, Peserico A, Eichenfield LF. Contact sensitization in very young children. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65(4):772-779. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2010.07.030. ; Boonchai W, Desomchoke R, Iamtharachai P. Trend of contact allergy to cosmetic ingredients in Thais over a period of 10 years. Contact Derm. 2011;65(6):311-316. ; Camacho-Halili M, Axelrod S, Michelis MA, et al. A multi-center, retrospective review of patch testing for contact dermatitis in allergy practices. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011;107(6):487-492. ; Dou X, Zhao Y, Ni C, Zhu X, Liu L. Prevalence of contact allergy at a dermatology clinic in China from 1990-2009. Dermatitis. 2011;22(6):324-331. ; Ni C, Dou X, Chen J, Zhu X, Liu L. Contact sensitization in chinese patients with hand eczema. Dermatitis. 2011;22(4):211-215. ; Yin R, Huang XY, Zhou XF, Hao F. A retrospective study of patch tests in Chongqing, China from 2004 to 2009. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;65(1):28-33. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01854.x. ; Almogren A, Shakoor Z, GadEl Rab MO, Adam MH. Pattern of patch test reactivity among patients with clinical diagnosis of contact dermatitis: a hospital-based study. Ann Saudi Med. 2012;32(4):404-407. ; Kiec-Swierczynska M, Krecisz B, Chomiczewska D, Sobala W. Trends in allergy to the 10 most frequent contact allergens in patients examined at the Nofer institute, Lodz, Poland in 1996-2009. Postepy Dermatologii I AlergologII. 2012;29(1):19-24. ; Reduta T, Bacharewicz J, Pawlos A. Patch test results in patients with allergic contact dermatitis in the Podlasie region. Postepy Dermatologii I Alergologii. 2013;30(6):350-357. doi:10.5114/pdia.2013.39433. ; Siu CFY, Cheng TS. Patch testing: clinical relevance and successful recall of allergens in local Chinese patients. Hong Kong J Dermatol Venereol. 2013;21(4):171-180. ; Søsted H, Rustemeyer T, Gonçalo M, et al. Contact allergy to common ingredients in hair dyes. Contact Derm. 2013;69(1):32-39. ; Morrone A, Bordignon V, Barnabas GA, et al. Clinical-epidemiological features of contact dermatitis in rural and urban communities in northern Ethiopia: correlation with environmental or occupational exposure. Int J Dermatol. 2014;53(8):975-980. ; Schwensen JF, Johansen JD, Veien NK, et al. Occupational contact dermatitis in hairdressers: an analysis of patch test data from the Danish contact dermatitis group, 2002-2011. Contact Derm. 2014;70(4):233-237. ; Simonsen AB, Deleuran M, Mortz CG, Johansen JD, Sommerlund M. Allergic contact dermatitis in Danish children referred for patch testing-a nationwide multicentre study. Contact Dermatitis. 2014;70(2):104-111. ; Wentworth AB, Yiannias JA, Keeling JH, et al. Trends in patch-test results and allergen changes in the standard series: a Mayo Clinic 5-year retrospective review (January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2010). J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70(2):269-275.e4. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2013.09.047. ; Fall S, Bruze M, Isaksson M, et al. Contact allergy trends in Sweden-a retrospective comparison of patch test data from 1992, 2000, and 2009. Contact Derm. 2015;72(5):297-304. ; Jenkins D, Chow ET. Allergic contact dermatitis to Para-phenylenediamine. Australas J Dermatol. 2015;56(1):40-43. ; Rastogi MK, Gupta A, Soodan PS, Mishra N, Gahalaut P. Evaluation of suspected cosmetic induced facial dermatoses with the use of Indian standard series and cosmetic series patch test. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(3):WC07-WC10. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2015/9714.5722. ; Tichy M, Karlova I. Allergic contact dermatitis and changes in the frequency of the causative allergens demonstrated with patch testing in 2008-2012. Biomed Papers Med Faculty University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia. 2015;159(3):480-488. doi:10.5507/bp.2014.022. ; Toholka R, Wang YS, Tate B, et al. The first Australian baseline series: recommendations for patch testing in suspected contact dermatitis. Australas J Dermatol. 2015;56(2):107-115. ; Vogel TA, Coenraads PJ, Bijkersma LM, Vermeulen KM, Schuttelaar MLA. P-Phenylenediamine exposure in real life - a case-control study on sensitization rate, mode and elicitation reactions in the northern Netherlands. Contact Derm. 2015;72(6):355-361. ; Warshaw EM, Maibach HI, Taylor JS, et al. North American contact dermatitis group patch test results: 2011-2012. Dermatitis. 2015;26(1):49-59. doi:10.1097/DER.0000000000000097. ; Mortazavi H, Ehsani A, Sajjadi SS, Aghazadeh N, Arian E. Patch testing in Iranian children with allergic contact dermatitis. BMC Dermatol. 2016;16(1):10. doi:10.1186/s12895-016-0047-0. ; Pónyai G, Diczig BM, Németh I, Temesvári E. Para-Phenylenediamine hypersensitivity: a report from Budapest, Hungary, 2007-2014. Dermatitis. 2016;27(5):303-307. ; Smith VM, Clark SM, Wilkinson M. Allergic contact dermatitis in children: trends in allergens, 10 years on. A retrospective study of 500 children tested between 2005 and 2014 in one UK centre. Contact Derm. 2016;74(1):37-43. ; DeKoven JG, Warshaw EM, Belsito DV, et al. North American contact dermatitis group patch test results 2013-2014. Dermatitis. 2017;28(1):33-46. doi:10.1097/DER.0000000000000225. ; How KN, Tang MM, Kaur R, Johar A. Contact sensitisation in adults: a 5-year retrospective review in hospital Kuala Lumpur. Med J Malaysia. 2017;72(2):113-118. ; Linauskienė K, Malinauskienė L, Blažienė A. Time trends of contact allergy to the European baseline series in Lithuania. Contact Dermatitis. 2017;76(6):350-356. ; Ochi H, Cheng SWN, Leow YH, Goon ATJ. Contact allergy trends in Singapore-a retrospective study of patch test data from 2009 to 2013. Contact Dermatitis. 2017;76(1):49-50. ; Shakoor Z, Al-Mutairi AS, Al-Shenaifi AM, Al-Abdulsalam AM, Al-Shirah BZ, Al-Harbi SA. Screening for skin-sensitizing allergens among patients with clinically suspected allergic contact dermatitis. Saudi Med J. 2017;38(9):922-927. ; Vogel TA, Heijnen RW, Coenraads PJ, Schuttelaar MLA. Two decades of p-phenylenediamine and toluene-2,5-diamine patch testing-focus on co-sensitizations in the European baseline series and cross-reactions with chemically related substances. Contact Dermatitis. 2017;76(2):81-88. ; DeKoven JG, Warshaw EM, Zug KA, et al. North american contact dermatitis group patch test results: 2015-2016. Dermatitis. 2018;29(6):297-309. ; Sharma VK, Bhatia R, Yadav CP. Clinical profile and allergens in pigmented cosmetic dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis to cosmetics in India. Dermatitis. 2018;29(5):264-269. ; Zafrir Y, Trattner A, Hodak E, Eldar O, Lapidoth M, Ben AD. Patch testing in Israeli children with suspected allergic contact dermatitis: a retrospective study and literature review. Pediatr Dermatol. 2018;35(1):76-86. doi:10.1111/pde.13333. ; Boonchai W, Winayanuwattikun W, Limphoka P, Sukakul T. Contact allergy to hair cosmetic allergens in Thailand. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;81(6):426-431. ; Keragala BSDP, Herath HMMTB, Keragala TS, Malavi MAMH, Rodrigo C, Gunasekera CN. A seven-year retrospective analysis of patch test data in a cohort of patients with contact dermatitis in Sri Lanka. BMC Dermatol 2019;19(1):10. doi:10.1186/s12895-019-0090-8. ; Ojo EO, Gowda A, Nedorost S. Scalp dermatitis in patients sensitized to components of hair products. Dermatitis. 2019;30(4):264-267. ; Sundquist BK, Yang B, Pasha MA. Experience in patch testing: a 6-year retrospective review from a single academic allergy practice. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Off Publ Am Coll Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019;122(5):502-507. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2019.02.028. ; Watts TJ, Watts S, Thursfield D, Haque R. A patch testing initiative for the investigation of allergic contact dermatitis in a UK allergy practice: a retrospective study. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7(1):89-95. ; Piapan L, Mauro M, Martinuzzo C, Larese FF. Characteristics and incidence of contact dermatitis among hairdressers in North-Eastern Italy. Contact Dermatitis. 2020;83(6):458-465. ; Wootton CI, Sodaly MK, Billamay SX, English JSC, Mayxay M. Patch test results in paediatric patients with atopic dermatitis in Laos. PloS One. 2020;15(4):e0231455. ; Boyvat A, Kalay YI. Patch test results of the European baseline series among 1309 patients in Turkey between 2013 and 2019. Contact Dermatitis. 2021;84(1):15-23. ; Lin PH, Tseng YH, Chu CY. Changing trends of contact allergens: a 40-year retrospective study from a referral center in northern Taiwan. Contact Dermatitis. 2021;85(1):39-45. ; Schäfer T, Böhler E, Ruhdorfer S, et al. Epidemiology of contact allergy in adults. Allergy. 2001;56(12):1192-1196. doi:10.1034/j.1398-9995.2001.00086.x. ; Dotterud LK, Smith-Sivertsen T. Allergic contact sensitization in the general adult population: a population-based study from northern Norway. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;56(1):10-15. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.00980.x. ; Czarnobilska E, Obtulowicz K, Dyga W, Spiewak R. The most important contact sensitizers in polish children and adolescents with atopy and chronic recurrent eczema as detected with the extended European baseline series. Pediatr Allergy Immunol Off Publ Eur Soc Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2011;22(2):252-256. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3038.2010.01075.x. ; Mortz CG, Bindslev-Jensen C, Andersen KE. Prevalence, incidence rates and persistence of contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis in the Odense adolescence cohort study: a 15-year follow-up. Br J Dermatol. 2013;168(2):318-325. ; Diepgen TL, Naldi L, Bruze M, et al. Prevalence of contact allergy to p-Phenylenediamine in the european general population. J Invest Dermatol. 2016;136(2):409-415. ; Lodi A, Mancini LL, Ambonati M, Coassini A, Ravanelli G, Crosti C. Epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis in a north Italian population. Eur J Dermatol EJD. 2000;10(2):128-132. ; Crippa M, Baruffini A, Belleri L, et al. Occupational dermatitis in a highly industrialized Italian region: the experience of four occupational health departments. Sci Total Environ. 2001;270(1):89-96. ; Nettis E, Marcandrea M, Colanardi MC, Paradiso MT, Ferrannini A, Tursi A. Results of standard series patch testing in patients with occupational allergic contact dermatitis. Allergy. 2003;58(12):1304-1307. ; O'Connell RL, White IR, Mc Fadden JP, White JML. Hairdressers with dermatitis should always be patch tested regardless of atopy status. Contact Dermatitis. 2010;62(3):177-181. ; Malvestio A, Bovenzi M, Hoteit M, et al. P-Phenylenediamine sensitization and occupation. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;64(1):37-42. ; Warshaw EM, Wang MZ, Mathias CGT, et al. Occupational contact dermatitis in hairdressers/cosmetologists: retrospective analysis of north american contact dermatitis group data, 1994 to 2010. Dermatitis. 2012;23(6):258-268. ; Lyons G, Roberts H, Palmer A, Matheson M, Nixon R. Hairdressers presenting to an occupational dermatology clinic in Melbourne, Australia. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;68(5):300-306. ; Pesonen M, Jolanki R, Larese Filon F, et al. Patch test results of the European baseline series among patients with occupational contact dermatitis across Europe-analyses of the European surveillance system on contact allergy network, 2002-2010. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;72(3):154-163. ; Schuttelaar MLA, Vogel TA, Rui F, et al. ESSCA results with the baseline series, 2002-2012: P-phenylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;75(3):165-172. ; Carøe TK, Ebbehøj NE, Agner T. Occupational dermatitis in hairdressers-influence of individual and environmental factors. Contact Dermatitis. 2017;76(3):146-150. ; Schubert S, Lessmann H, Schnuch A, Uter W, Geier J. Factors associated with p-phenylenediamine sensitization: data from the information network of departments of dermatology, 2008-2013. Contact Dermatitis. 2018;78(3):199-207. ; Uter W, Lessmann H, Geier J, Schnuch A. Contact allergy to ingredients of hair cosmetics in female hairdressers and clientsan 8-year analysis of IVDK data. Contact Dermatitis. 2003;49(5):236-240. ; Uter W, Lessmann H, Geier J, Schnuch A. Contact allergy to hairdressing allergens in female hairdressers and clientscurrent data from the IVDK, 2003-2006. J Deutsch Dermatol Gesellsch J German Soc Dermatol JDDG. 2007;5(11):993-1001. ; Uter W, Gefeller O, John SM, Schnuch A, Geier J. Contact allergy to ingredients of hair cosmetics-a comparison of female hairdressers and clients based on IVDK 2007-2012 data. Contact Dermatitis. 2014;71(1):13-20. ; Gregoriou S, Mastraftsi S, Hatzidimitriou E, et al. Occupational and non-occupational allergic contact dermatitis to hair dyes in Greece. A 10-year retrospective study. Contact Dermatitis. 2020;83(4):277-285. ; Hasan T, Rantanen T, Alanko K, et al. Patch test reactions to cosmetic allergens in 1995-1997 and 2000-2002 in Finlanda multicentre study. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;53(1):40-45. ; Ito A, Nishioka K, Kanto H, et al. A multi-institutional joint study of contact dermatitis related to hair colouring and perming agents in Japan. Contact Dermatitis. 2017;77(1):42-48. ; Wang MZ, Farmer SA, Richardson DM, Davis MDP. Patch-testing with hairdressing chemicals. Dermatitis. 2011;22(1):16-26. ; Winhoven SM, Rutter KJ, Beck MH. Toluene-2,5-diamine may be an isolated allergy in individuals sensitized by permanent hair dye. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;57(3):193. ; Tresukosol P, Swasdivanich C. Hand contact dermatitis in hairdressers: clinical and causative allergens, experience in Bangkok. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2012;30(4):306-312. ; Valks R, Conde-Salazar L, Malfeito J, Ledo S. Contact dermatitis in hairdressers, 10 years later: patch-test results in 300 hairdressers (1994 to 2003) and comparison with previous study. Dermatitis. 2005;16(1):28-31. ; Fransway AF, Zug KA, Belsito DV, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for 2007-2008. Dermatitis. 2013;24(1):10-21. ; Marks JG, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1996-1998. Arch Dermatol. 2000;136(2):272-273. doi:10.1001/archderm.136.2.272. ; Marks JG, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American contact dermatitis group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000. Am J Contact Dermat Off J Am Contact Dermat Soc. 2003;14(2):59-62. ; Patel D, Belsito DV. The detection of clinically relevant contact allergens with a standard screening tray of 28 allergens. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;66(3):154-158. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.02022.x. ; Tam I, Schalock PC, González E, Yu J. Patch testing results from the Massachusetts general hospital contact dermatitis clinic, 2007-2016. Dermatitis. 2020;31(3):202-208. ; Veverka KK, Hall MR, Yiannias JA, et al. Trends in patch testing with the mayo clinic standard series, 2011-2015. Dermatitis. 2018;29(6):310-315. ; Warshaw EM, Buchholz HJ, Belsito DV, et al. Allergic patch test reactions associated with cosmetics: retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2001-2004. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60(1):23-38. ; Warshaw EM, Belsito DV, Taylor JS, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results: 2009 to 2010. Dermatitis. 2013;24(2):50-59. ; Wetter DA, Davis MDP, Yiannias JA, et al. Patch test results from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 1998-2000. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53(3):416-421. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2005.04.077. ; Zug KA, Warshaw EM, Fowler JFJ, et al. Patch-test results of the north american contact dermatitis group 2005-2006. Dermatitis. 2009;20(3):149-160. ; Krecisz B, Kiec-Swierczynska M, Chomiczewska D. Dermatological screening and results of patch testing among Polish apprentice hairdressers. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;64(2):90-95. ; Macan J, Babić Ž, Hallmann S, et al. Respiratory toxicity of persulphate salts and their adverse effects on airways in hairdressers: a systematic review. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2022;95:1679-1702. doi:10.1007/s00420-022-01852-w. ; Aalto-Korte K, Mäkinen-Kiljunen S. Specific immunoglobulin E in patients with immediate persulfate hypersensitivity. Contact Dermatitis. 2003;49(1):22-25. doi:10.1111/j.0105-1873.2003.00134.x. ; Helaskoski E, Suojalehto H, Kuuliala O, Aalto-Korte K. Prick testing with chemicals in the diagnosis of occupational contact urticaria and respiratory diseases. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;72(1):20-32. ; Helaskoski E, Suojalehto H, Virtanen H, et al. Occupational asthma, rhinitis, and contact urticaria caused by oxidative hair dyes in hairdressers. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014;112(1):46-52. ; Xie Z, Hayakawa R, Sugiura M, et al. Experimental study on skin sensitization potencies and cross-reactivities of hair-dye-related chemicals in Guinea pigs. Contact Dermatitis. 2000;42(5):270-275. ; Yamano T, Shimizu M. Skin sensitization potency and cross-reactivity of p-phenylenediamine and its derivatives evaluated by non-radioactive murine local lymph node assay and Guinea-pig maximization test. Contact Dermatitis. 2009;60(4):193-198. ; Goebel C, Troutman J, Hennen J, et al. Introduction of a methoxymethyl side chain into p-phenylenediamine attenuates its sensitizing potency and reduces the risk of allergy induction. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2014;274(3):480-487. ; Cruz MJ, De Vooght V, Muñoz X, et al. Assessment of the sensitization potential of persulfate salts used for bleaching hair. Contact Dermatitis. 2009;60(2):85-90. ; Antelmi A, Bruze M, Zimerson E, et al. Evaluation of concordance between labelling and content of 52 hair dye products: overview of the market of oxidative hair dye. Eur J Dermatol EJD. 2017;27(2):123-131. ; Koh D, Tan C, Ng SK, Tan BT, Leow YH, Goh CL. Screening for p-phenylenediamine (PPD) in hair-care products by thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Contact Dermatitis. 2000;43(3):182-183. ; Rastogi SC, Søsted H, Johansen JD, Menné T, Bossi R. Unconsumed precursors and couplers after formation of oxidative hair dyes. Contact Dermatitis. 2006;55(2):95-100. ; Hueber-Becker F, Nohynek GJ, Dufour EK, et al. Occupational exposure of hairdressers to [C-14]-para-phenylenediamine-containing oxidative hair dyes: a mass balance study. Food Chem Toxicol. 2007;45(1):160-169. ; Lind ML, Boman A, Surakka J, Sollenberg J, Meding B. A method for assessing occupational dermal exposure to permanent hair dyes. Ann Occup Hyg. 2004;48(6):533-539. ; Lind ML, Boman A, Sollenberg J, Johnsson S, Hagelthorn G, Meding B. Occupational dermal exposure to permanent hair dyes among hairdressers. Ann Occup Hyg. 2005;49(6):473-480. ; Lind ML, Johnsson S, Meding B, Boman A. Permeability of hair dye compounds p-phenylenediamine, toluene-2,5-diaminesulfate and resorcinol through protective gloves in hairdressing. Ann Occup Hyg. 2007;51(5):479-485. ; Lee HS, Lin YW. Permeation of hair dye ingredients, p-phenylenediamine and aminophenol isomers, through protective gloves. Ann Occup Hyg. 2009;53(3):289-296. ; Antelmi A, Young E, Svedman C, et al. Are gloves sufficiently protective when hairdressers are exposed to permanent hair dyes? An in vivo study. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;72(4):229-236. ; Bruze M. Thoughts on how to improve the quality of multicentre patch test studies. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;74(3):168-174. doi:10.1111/cod.12507. ; Uter W, Rustemeyer T, Wilkinson M, Duus JJ. Quality in epidemiological surveillance of contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;74(3):175-180. doi:10.1111/cod.12518. ; Strahwald J. Systematic Review on Sensitisation by Exposure to Important Constituents of Oxidative Hair Dyes in Hairdressers and Consumers. Master Thesis "Medical Process Management"; 2021. ; Kirchlechner S, Hübner A, Uter W. Survey of sensitizing components of oxidative hair dyes (retail and professional products) in Germany. J Deutsch Dermatol Gesellsch J German Soc Dermatol JDDG. 2016;14(7):707-715. ; Uter W, Geier J, Lessmann H, Schnuch A. Is contact allergy to glyceryl monothioglycolate still a problem in Germany? Contact Dermatitis. 2006;55(1):54-56. doi:10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.0847b.x. ; Uter W, Bensefa-Colas L, Frosch P, et al. Patch testing with hair cosmetic series in Europe: a critical review and recommendation. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;73(2):69-81. doi:10.1111/cod.12424. ; Yazar K, Boman A, Liden C. Potent skin sensitizers in oxidative hair dye products on the Swedish market. Contact Dermatitis. 2009;61(5):269-275. ; Yazar K, Boman A, Liden C. P-Phenylenediamine and other hair dye sensitizers in Spain. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;66(1):27-32. ; Brunn Poulsen P, Strandesen M. Survey and Occurrence of PPD, PTD and Other Allergenic Hair Dye Substances in Hair Dyes. The Danish Environmental Protection Agency; 2013. ; Hamann D, Yazar K, Hamann CR, Thyssen JP, Lidén C. P-Phenylenediamine and other allergens in hair dye products in the United States: a consumer exposure study. Contact Dermatitis. 2014;70(4):213-218. ; Boonchai W, Bunyavaree M, Winayanuwattikun W, Kasemsarn P. Contact sensitizers in commercial hair dye products sold in Thailand. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;74(4):222-229. ; Kim H, Kim K. Prevalence of potent skin sensitizers in oxidative hair dye products in Korea. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2016;35(3):204-207.
- Contributed Indexing: Keywords: CAS no. 106-50-3; CAS no. 30618-84-9; CAS no. 5421-46-5; CAS no. 7727-21-1; CAS no. 7727-54-0; CAS no. 95-70-5; RRID:SCR_001905; hairdressers; occupational diseases; skin diseases; systematic review; workers' health
- Substance Nomenclature: 0 (Hair Dyes) ; 0 (Hair Preparations)
- Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20221018 Date Completed: 20230118 Latest Revision: 20230118
- Update Code: 20231215
|
